Cervical foraminotomy is one of the most surgically elegant options available for treating nerve root compression in the neck — it targets the problem directly, preserves the natural motion of the treated level, and does not involve fusion.
The Anatomy-Driven Decision: When Foraminotomy Is the Right Choice
Not every cervical radiculopathy patient is a foraminotomy candidate, and at POA Mullica Hill we are explicit about the anatomical criteria rather than applying the procedure broadly. Foraminotomy is most appropriate when:
- The compression is predominantly foraminal — bone spurs or foraminal narrowing, rather than central disc herniation causing cord pressure
- Disc height is reasonably preserved at the affected level — significant disc space collapse changes the biomechanics and typically makes fusion more appropriate
- There is no instability at the affected segment — foraminotomy is a decompression procedure, not a stabilization procedure
- Single or limited-level involvement — multilevel disease with cord compromise is typically better addressed with an anterior approach
- The patient has failed a reasonable conservative trial, including physical therapy and potentially a cervical epidural steroid injection
When a patient comes to us having been told they need ACDF by another provider, we review the imaging with a fresh set of eyes. If the anatomy supports foraminotomy as a technically sound alternative, we explain that option and the rationale. If ACDF is in fact the more appropriate procedure for their specific anatomy, we explain that too — and exactly why. Patients deserve to understand the anatomical basis for the recommendation they receive.






